|
The following articles are by
James Everett, a 17-year CIA veteran.
Pirate-Hostage
By James A. Everett
On Wednesday morning April 8, 2009 the cargo ship MV
Alabama was sailing in the Indian Ocean about 300 miles off the coast of
Somalia en route to Mombassa, Kenya when pirates started threatening her
with weapons. Her captain, Richard Phillips, sent out a radio distress call
and ordered his crew to shut down the engines and generators and then lock
themselves in an out-of-the-way compartment. He said he would stay in the
pilot house and negotiate with the pirates. The following greatly redacted
details were received from a confidential source to help give my readers
what Paul Harvey would say is part of "the rest of the story."
The pirates boarded and ordered the captain to start
the engines, but there was no answer from the engine room. The lead pirate
ordered two of his four men to go down into the pitch black vessel to find
the engineer and get the engines started. But the crew jumped then in the
dark and took away their weapons. One pirate managed to get away, but the
crew bound the other, taped his mouth shut and put a knife to his throat. In
the meantime other crew members had opened the drain cock on the pirate's
boat causing it to sink. The pirates then ordered the captain to launch one
of his rescue boats for their use. He did, but at the same time made it
non-operational.
The crew then appeared with their captive pirate to
negotiate a trade but let him go too soon. So a situation developed where
the pirates were able to hold the captain in a jammed rescue vessel and the
crew on board is waiting for their rescue by the USS Bainbridge which will
not reach them until the next day. Before its arrival, a U.S. Navy Maritime
Patrol Aircraft, with a Navy SEAL Team, flew over the scene and dropped a
buoy with a radio in order to talk to the pirates. Fearing the radio had a
homing device they promptly threw it overboard and demanded a satellite
telephone so they could call home for help; which they did. This resulted in
a ship being sent by the pirates from Somalia containing some 54 hostages
from previous raids; but it never played a significant role in the enfolding
drama.
A rescue using "Combat Swimmers" was
discussed, but was vetoed as the captain did not seem to be in immediate
danger. By late Saturday night they talked the pirates into sending their
wounded man over for treatment and, at the same time, attempted to provide
them with food and water which was refused. The Navy then advised the
pirates of incoming threatening weather and offered to tow their little
rescue boat. The pirates agreed and the USS Bainbridge took them in tow
using a 30 meter rope which is the exact distance the SEALS practice their
shooting skills.
The towed lifeboat, riding the larger vessel's
"roostertail," had a 17-second period of harmonic motion, meaning
that at the end of every half-period (8.5 seconds) it was basically steady.
At this range a Navy SEAL, using a .308 caliber Mark 11 Mod sniper rifle is
trained to put slugs inside the head of a quarter day or night. Their
monocular scopes can "see" heat and draw a bead on it. The
pirates, while not realizing it, were now like the proverbial "fish in
a barrel." The only problem was to remove the plexiglass window a split
second before the kill-shots so that it would not deflect the trajectory of
the bullets.
On the exact countdown of 8.5 seconds one shot
removed the canopy, followed essentially simultaneous by three kill-shots
and the standoff was over; Navy 3, Pirates 0.
While violence is almost always to be eschewed,
there is comfort in knowing that our armed forces are eminently capable of
advancing the security of the U.S., and ofttimes the world, when called upon
under legitimate circumstances to do so.
Torture
By James A. Everett
One of the key news items recently has been the
partial release of classified documents regarding the CIA's use of
waterboarding of detainees in U.S. custody. This was brought into sharp
focus when President Obama made a highly publicized visit to the CIA's
headquarters where he indicated his administration would not prosecute CIA
operatives for their harsh treatment of prisoners.
While my years of serving as deep cover CIA
intelligence officer had no direct connection to these specific events, the
fact that I have been exposed to CIA torture training gives me some personal
insights on this issue. For the record, there has always been a firm CIA
understanding that waterboarding is torture, even though the Bush
Administration spent considerable effort and legal maneuvering to muddy that
issue.
I find it ironic that the Bush administration did
everything in their power to stop the release of these documents on torture.
However, when that proved impossible, former V.P. Dick Cheney pulled a
switcheroo calling for the release of memos which would detail the
effectiveness of waterboarding in collecting valuable intelligence; thus, in
his opinion, adding to the security of U.S. citizens. Based on the documents
released this past week, Cheney appears to be simply spitting against the
wind.
The first truth about intelligence gained from
torture is that it is always highly suspect. Another truth is that if one
destroys the person being tortured the torturer gets a failing grade. This
is why, both on humanitarian reasons and the questionable value of the
intelligence product, torture has been declared out of bounds by the Geneva
Conventions.
We now know that waterboarding was used a total of
266 times on two of three al Qaeda suspects. One memo states, "…
where authorized, it [waterboarding] may be used for two 'sessions' per day
of up to two hours. During a session, water may be applied up to six times
for ten seconds or longer (but never more than 40 seconds) in a 24-hour
period, a detainee may be subjected to up to twelve minutes of water
application. …" I find such information chilling and reminiscent of
the clinical information written by Nazi's "death doctors" and
totally out of character for what America stands for.
While much has been redacted from the memos, it is
clear that slamming detainees against walls and various other demeaning
torture techniques were in common use. Invariably such action by one nation
provides justification for others to respond in a like manner. Thus, while
we are talking about "enemy combatants," i.e. persons dehumanized
by the Bush Administration, Americans in the future may suffer as a result
of this unwise policy.
One can argue that CIA personnel were simply
"doing their duty" as demanded by their superiors. The validity of
that defense was pretty well invalidated as a result of the Nuremburg trials
following WWII. Obama may be commended for wanting the nation to move on
rather than "laying blame for the past;" thus ruling out
prosecution for CIA personnel who carried out orders to torture.
On the other hand, it is still to be determined
whether or not the American people will be content to easily overlook this
sad chapter in our history. Obama did not rule out the possibility of a
future Truth Commission or a Commission of Inquiry. In fact, a new
organization "Partners of the National Religious Campaign Against
Torture (NRCAT)," is, with both Catholic and Protestant support,
pushing for just such a Commission.
__________________
The Cold War Veterans Institute is seeking essays/monographs
on the following topics:
Articulating an American Energy Policy
What do you think should be the energy
policy of the United States for the next ten years? Please be sure to
include a discussion of renewable energy sources as well as fiscal
incentives and penalties using the Internal Revenue Code.
Articulating an American Immigration Policy
What do you think should be the immigration
policy of the United States for the next ten years? Please be sure to
include a discussion of ethno-demographics in your response.
Integrating Eastern and Western Europe
Discuss the benefits and detriments of
continued integration of Eastern Europe into the Western system including to
what extent Turkey should be integrated.
Did China win the Cold War?
With Western democracies experiencing
stagflating economies and China on the ascendancy, can an argument be made
that the Cold War did not end with the Soviet Union formally dissolving in
December 1991 but with the Communist Chinese riding out the bipolar epic and
on the verge of capturing the banner of the world’s leading hegemonic
power?
Essay Guidelines
We are looking for professional
documents presentable to conferences.
Citation to authority is important:
- Submissions are to contain a minimum
of 10 citations with a maximum of 150.
- Citations are to be in endnote form
(except where alternate citation is necessary).
- Proper legal citations should be
used as appropriate.
- Where appropriate, statistical and/or
historical data should be included.
- Direct quotes from personal
interviews are welcome with proper citation.
Graphs and other visual aids are
welcome.
Email essays/monographs to:
coldwar@coldwarveterans.com
__________________
United States Constitution
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Historical/Legal Documents Collection
|